The tar ( 19.5 ) command isn't just for tape archives. It can copy files from disk to disk, too. And even if your computer has cp -r ( 18.15 ) , there are advantages to using tar .
The obvious way to copy directories with tar is to write them onto a tape archive with relative pathnames - then read back the tape and write it somewhere else on the disk. But tar can also write to a UNIX pipe - and read from a pipe. This looks like:
%reading-tar
|
writing-tar
with one trick: the
writing-tar
process
has a different current directory (
38.3
,
38.4
)
(the place where you want the copy made) than the
reading-tar
. To do that, run the
writing-tar
in a
subshell (
13.7
)
.
The argument(s) to the
reading-tar
can be directory(s) or file(s). Just be sure to use
relative pathnames (
14.2
)
that don't start with a slash - otherwise, the
writing-tar
will write the copies in the same place the originals came from!
"How about an example," you ask? Figure 18.2 has one. It copies from the directory /home/jane , with all its files and subdirectories. The copy is made in the directory /work/bkup/jane :
%mkdir /work/bkup/jane
%cd /home/jane
%tar cf - . | (cd /work/bkup/jane && tar xBf -)
The
&&
operator (
44.9
)
tells the shell to start
tar xBf
only if the previous command (the
cd
) succeeded. That prevents
tar
writing files into the same directory it's reading from - if the destination directory isn't accessible or you flub its pathname.
If your
tar
has a
B
(reblocking) option, use it to help be sure that the copy is made correctly. If your
tar
doesn't have a reblocking option, you can use this trick suggested by Chris Torek:
%tar cf - . | cat | (cd /work/backup/jane && tar xbf 1 -)
CAUTION: At least one tar version has a v (verbose) option that writes the verbose text to standard output instead of standard error ! ( 19.8 ) If your tar does that, don't use v on the
reading-tar
(the tar that feeds the pipe)-use v on thewriting-tar
.
You can use other options that your
tar
might have-like
excluding files or directories (
20.8
)
- on the
reading-tar
, too. Some gotchas:
Symbolic links ( 18.4 ) will be copied exactly. If they point to relative pathnames, the copied links might point to locations that don't exist. You can search for these symbolic links with find -type l ( 17.13 ) or oldlinks ( 16.28 ) .
A hard link ( 18.4 ) will be copied as a file. If there are more hard links to that file in the files you're copying, they will be linked to the copy of the first link. That can be good because the destination might be on a different filesystem (a hard link to the original file can't work then). It can be bad if the link pointed to a really big file; the copy can take a lot of disk space. You can search for these hard links by:
Searching the directory from which you're copying with find -links +1 -type f ( 17.5 ) to find all files that have more than one link, and
Running the
reading-tar
with its
l
(lowercase letter L) option to complain if it didn't copy all links to a file.
If your system has
rsh
(
1.33
)
, you can run the
writing-tar
on a remote system. For example, to copy a directory to the computer named
kumquat
:
%rsh kumquat mkdir /work/bkup/jane
%tar cf - . | rsh kumquat 'cd /work/bkup/jane && tar xBf -'
-